Ukljucite javascript
Register Log in

Archive > Year 2011, Number 3

Effects of different hand paddle sizes on bilateral propulsive force difference in the front crawl swimming


Authors

Abstract

This study investigated the effect of different sizes of hand paddles on bilateral propulsive force difference (BFD) in the crawl stroke. Fourteen male swimmers (Age: 20.0 ± 3.7 years, 100-m best time: 53.70 ± 0.87 s) were submitted to the following test protocol: 2 x 10 s maximal efforts in the fully tethered swimming, repeated in five conditions: free swimming (FREE), with small (PP, 280 cm²), medium (PM, 352 cm²), large (PG, 462 cm²) and extra-large paddles (PGG, 552 cm²). Stronger (STR) and weaker (WKR) strokes were those which presented the higher and lower mean peak force values in four non-consecutive strokes, respectively. BFD was expressed by the percentage difference between STR and WKR. STR and WKR were significantly different in all the situations (FREE: 30.2 x 25.4 kgf; PP: 31.6 x 26.9 kgf; PM: 33.0 x 29.0 kgf; PG: 34.5 x 30.3 kgf; PGG: 36.0 x 31.6 kgf). No specific paddle size changed BFD significantly. A significant reduction occurred when the lower individual values of BFD obtained with hand paddles, independently of their size, were compared to those found in FREE (14.9% x 7.4%). The present results showed that the artificial enlargement of hands can acutely reduce the bilateral force difference in competitive swimmers. However, the best size of paddles should be individually chosen.

Keywords

Hand paddles, bilateral symmetry, propulsive force, tethered swimming

Download full article

References

  1. Becker, T., & Havriluk, R. (2006). Bilateral and anterior-posterior muscular imbalances in swimmers. Portuguese Journal of Sports Science, 6 (supl. 2), 327-338.
  2. Bixler, B. S. (2008). Resistance and propulsion. In Stager, J. M. & Tanner, D. A. (Eds.). IOC handbook of sports medicine and science: Swimming. (p. 69-119), Barueri: Manole.
  3. Dopsaj, M., Matković, I., & Zdravković, I. (2000). The relationship between 50m-freestyle results and characteristics of tethered forces in male sprint swimmers: a new approach to tethered swimming test. Facta Universitatis – Series: Physical and Education in Sport, 1(7), 15-22.
  4. Glaister, M. (2005). Multiple sprint work: physiological responses, mechanisms of fatigue and the influence of aerobic fitness. Sports Medicine, 35(9), 757-777.
  5. Gourgoulis, V., Aggeloussis, N., Vezos, N., Antoniou, P., & Mavromatis, G. (2008). Hand orientation in hand paddle swimming. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 29(5), 429-434.
  6. Havriluk, R. (2010a). Analyzing hand force in swimming: three typical limiting factors. American Swimming Magazine, 1, 6-8.
  7. Havriluk, R. (2010b). Analysis of swimming performance using advanced technology. .
  8. Havriluk, R. (2007). Analyzing hand force in swimming: bilateral symmetry. American Swimming Magazine, 1, 34-38.
  9. McGinnis, P. M. (2002). Biomechanics of sport and exercise. Champaign, IL, USA: Human Kinetics.
  10. Monteil, K. M., & Rouard, A. H. (1994). Free swimming versus paddles swimming in front crawl. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 27, 89-99.
  11. Monteil, K. M., & Rouard, A. H. (1992). Influence of the size of the paddles in front crawl stroke. In MacLaren, D., Reilly, T. & Lees, A. (Eds.). Biomechanics and Medicine in Swimming – Swimming Science VI. (p. 99-104), London, UK: E and FN Spon.
  12. Moré, F. C., Carpes, F. P., & Castro, F. A. S. (2007). Swimming forces symmetry: the influence of breathing. In Proceedings of the XIIth Brazilian Biomechanics Congress. (pp. 518-523), São Pedro, Brazil: Tec Art.
  13. Ogita, F., Onodera, T., & Tabata, I. (1999). Effects of hand paddles on anaerobic energy release during supramaximal swimming. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 31(5), 729-735.
  14. Papoti, M., Martins, L., Cunha, S., Zagatto, A., & Gobatto, C. (2003). Standardization of a specific protocol to determine the anaerobic conditioning in swimmers during a 30 sec effort using load cells. Portuguese Journal of Sports Science, 3(3), 36-42.
  15. Schleihauf, R. E., Higgins, J. R., Hinrinchs, R., Luedtke, D., Maglischo, C., Maglischo, E. W., et al. (1988). Propulsive techniques: front crawl stroke, butterfly, backstroke, and breaststroke. In Ungerechts, B. E., Wilke, K. & Reischle, K. (Eds.). International series on sports science – Swimming science V. (p. 53-59), Champaign: Human Kinetics Publishers.
  16. Seifert, L., Chollet, D., & Allard, P. (2005). Arm coordination symmetry and breathing effect in front crawl. Human Movement Science, 24(2), 234-256.
  17. Swaine, I. L. (1997). Time course of changes in bilateral arm power of swimmers during recovery from injury using a swim bench. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 31(3), 213-216.
  18. Toussaint, H. M., Janssen, T., & Kluft, M. (1991). Effect of propelling surface size on the mechanics and energetics of front crawl swimming. Journal of Biomechanics, 24(3-4), 205-211.
  19. Toussaint, H. M., & Beek, P. J. (1992). Biomechanics of competitive front-crawl swimming. Sports Medicine, 13(1), 8-24.
  20. Winter, D. A. (1990). Biomechanics and motor control of human movement. New Jersey, USA: John Wiley & Sons.